Spicer Rudstrom, PLLC • Attorneys at Law • Est. 1963  •
Home |

Trial Court’s Refusal to Dismiss a Claim: Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Summary, Linda Lawson v. HDK Industries Inc., et al.

Trial Court’s Refusal to Dismiss a Claim: Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board Summary, Linda Lawson v. HDK Industries Inc., et al.

April 20, 2017

By Courtney S. Paterson

Linda Lawson v. HDK Industries, Inc., et al.             

Docket No. 2016-02-0297      

State File No. 32360-2016

Filed March 31, 2017


This is a case before the Appeals Board on interlocutory appeal filed by the employer, HDK Industries, Inc., et al., and the dispute was whether the trial court abused its discretion by not dismissing the case after the employee, Linda Lawson, failed to show cause as to why the case should not be dismissed based on her failure to request a hearing.

Ms. Lawson alleged she sustained injuries on April 22, 2016, when she slipped and suffered an injury to her right leg and ankle while at work. She was taken to the hospital and administered a drug test, which came back positive for oxycodone. The employer then denied her claim and terminated her employment.

Ms. Lawson filed a petition for benefit determination. The parties were unable to resolve their dispute through mediation, and the mediator signed a dispute certification notice. An order was entered requiring the parties to appear to “show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to file a Request for Expedited Hearing or a Request for Scheduling Hearing within sixty (60) days.” The employer filed a Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions, asserting Employee had failed to appear for her deposition, which had been scheduled by agreement and for which notice of deposition had been issued. The trial court conducted a show cause hearing and issued an order that same date declining to dismiss Ms. Lawson’s claim.

The appeals board affirmed the trial court’s decision, finding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to dismiss the employee’s claim.


An associate with Spicer Rudstrom since 2009, Courtney focuses her practice on automobile liability, insurance coverage litigation, insurance defense litigation, insurance subrogation, premises liability, products liability and workers’ compensation. She is admitted to practice in all trial and appellate state courts in Tennessee, as well as the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee.


Related Articles

Employee’s Request for Continuance of Trial on Eve of Trial

Appeals Board Holds that Sleep Deprivation Caused Truck Driver’s Fainting Episode

Street Risk Doctrine


Spicer Rudstrom PLLC was founded in 1963 and currently has more than 40 attorneys with offices in Memphis, Nashville, Chattanooga, Knoxville, Little Rock and Texarkana. We offer representation across industries, including construction, real estate, employment, medical malpractice, retail and hospitality, trucking and transportation, and business. Our clients range from local and national businesses to international companies seeking business, legal and litigation services. The firm’s commitment to its clients and its entrepreneurial spirit drives Spicer Rudstrom to be the premier litigation firm in the South. For more information, visit www.spicerfirm.com.

© 2018 Spicer Rudstrom PLLC | Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy

The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

Spicer Rudstrom is a member of the International Society of Primerus Law Firms.
Spicer Rudstrom Celebrating Our 50th Anniversary.